Yes. Explain what each record actually demonstrates. Attendance may show exposure without establishing the employee’s role in applying or developing the relevant knowledge.
Connect records to the person’s work
Use genuine project responsibilities and other relevant evidence to describe the experience claimed. Do not attribute the entire team’s work to the applicant. A clear account of actual contributions is more useful than an undifferentiated collection of manuals.
Internal service manuals that differ from public documentation, engineering change notices, the warranty and failure database, training materials used only for dealers under contract, and any patents or confidentiality policies covering the designs. Revision histories that name the employee, commissioning records for a system built in-house, an internal manual they wrote, and purchase files showing standard equipment was modified to a specification all speak without adjectives. Useful items include the system manual and its revision history, the crop recipe library with dates showing internal development, the calibration and validation procedures, incident and fault records demonstrating the reasoning applied, and training curricula showing the months required to bring a grower to competence. Corporate records may establish the qualifying relationship and active operations, but the worker needs an individual chronology of foreign employment, training, system access, projects, authored materials and problem-solving.