No. Review the actual ownership and governing rights and the role developing and directing the enterprise.
Read the operating agreement
Identify restrictions and decision-making authority. Contribution amount alone does not explain who can direct the business.
Request the same formation, ownership, and financial records that would be required for an unfamiliar business, and confirm the investor's treaty nationality and lawful source of funds independently of any local endorsement. Gather passports establishing the investor’s treaty citizenship, a complete ownership ledger showing at least 50 percent treaty-national ownership, and the agreements demonstrating development-and-direction control. The investment must be substantial in relation to the total cost of the enterprise and irrevocably committed and at risk, so money still sitting in an account, or recoverable at the applicant's option, has not yet met the requirement however large the figure. Because the category asks whether treaty-country nationals own at least half the enterprise, and whether the investor genuinely develops and directs it, shares or voting rights placed in a relative's name can move the answer to a question nobody meant to open. A store with signed supplier agreements, live sales channels, working capital spent and an owner directing operations can be described in those terms; a domain name and a bank balance alone cannot.