No universal exclusivity requirement applies. Explain the real special or advanced organizational knowledge and its proposed use without inventing an irreplaceability claim.
Describe the experience that matters to this assignment
Identify the implementation problem and what the employee has actually learned from handling similar work. Colleagues may share some knowledge. A candid account of that overlap is compatible with assessing the correct standard rather than asserting that all information is unique.
Begin by identifying the organization-specific subject matter: a protected process, unusual configuration method, manufacturing sequence, implementation technique, research program, or internally developed service model. Where training evidence helps is on the first question: if the company's own records show that a competent industrial technologist takes eighteen months of internal work before being trusted to requalify a formulation, that is direct evidence the knowledge is advanced and company-specific. The principal’s case also must document the required uninterrupted twelve-month foreign employment period, qualifying related organizations that conduct business, and specialized knowledge of company products or advanced company procedures.